The Work of Voice Writing Court Reporters
Technology has come to disrupt most job sectors, with the legal system not spared. Voice writing court reporters have been one of the affected groups. It has emerged, however, that maybe it is not wise to rush to replace them with technologically based solutions.
Technology may seem like the perfect solution, but it does not appear to be so in most cases. Keep in mind the fact that those solutions are man-made, and in case of any error in their coding or execution, you can expect the final report to come out with those errors intact. Human beings, on the other hand, possess the power to realize their mistakes and make amendments to ensure that the final copy bears none of them.
There is an even higher need for more accurate and thorough documentation of every proceeding, evidence, and even the tiniest mention in courts when it comes to testimonies, statements, actions, verdicts, and such events within the courts. A highly trained certified court reporter is thus a necessary profession today. Audio and video recording may get everything down, but then you are left with the task of farming out the transcribing work to writers or other technology-based solutions out there.
There are even more reasons why it is necessary to hire voice writing court reporters for assured results.
They, for one, have been well trained. Voice writing court reporters normally get years of training to understand the art and science of court recording. They get properly trained in how to accurately and swiftly record spoken words in real-time. They need to capture every word as it is spoken in real-time. They need to be fast, and to have the presence of mind, no matter the course the conversations or exchanges take. The best among them have been benchmarked and found to type up to 300 words a minute.
They also have the necessary knowledge. They are well versed in the special terminologies used in the courtroom. Their vocabulary is geared towards enabling them to provide precise details of court proceedings. They can, for instance, distinguish the feel of the deposition, which technology is unable to even comprehend.
They are also critical of details. They, for example, can notice changes in the tone of voice, differences in accents, mumblings, and other changes that come across in speech. They can also ask for a statement to be repeated, to capture its actual intended meaning. Technology sadly fails in that department. Such accuracy in the final report is something you could never expect from the technological solutions, no matter what other competencies they may possess.
They also add the element of credibility in their work. Their reports do bear significant weight when it comes to taking further legal action. You can be certain that the data is valid, accurate, and detailed. Since they do make the transcription in real-time, any questions they have for clarification can get an instant response. They are also unbiased in the cases, which allows their report to be applied objectively by either side of the case.